Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
844-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

844-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.048032 50.858486)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.047961 50.858478,-1.047964 50.858492,-1.047974 50.858505,-1.047990 50.858515,-1.048009 50.858521,-1.048031 50.858524,-1.048053 50.858522,-1.048073 50.858515,-1.048089 50.858506,-1.048100 50.858493,-1.048103 50.858479,-1.048100 50.858465,-1.048090 50.858453,-1.048075 50.858443,-1.048055 50.858436,-1.048033 50.858434,-1.048011 50.858436,-1.047991 50.858442,-1.047975 50.858452,-1.047965 50.858464,-1.047961 50.858478)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL